Campostoma anomalum
central stoneroller
Type Locality
Licking River, Kentucky
(Rafinesque 1820).
Etymology/Derivation of Scientific Name
Campostoma meaning
“curved mouth,” anomalum meaning “extraordinary” (Becker 1983).
Synonymy
Rutilus
anomalum Rafinesque 1820:52
Campostoma anomalum Cook 1959:95
Campostoma anomalum pullum Burr and Cashner
1983:115.
(Ross
2001).
Characters
Maximum size: 287 mm
(11.3 in)
TL (Lennon and Parker 1960).
Coloration: Dark
olivaceous above, grading to whitish on the underside; sides of most adults
marked by randomly scattered, small, dark spots which represent regenerated
scales; fins colorless (Miller and Robison 2004). Breeding males develop
striking color patterns, the entire dorsum becoming dark slate-gray;
undersides of body and lower fins are pale, sometimes yellowish; dorsal,
anal, and pelvic fins with black pigment (Miller 1962).
Peritoneum lining black
(Goldstein and Simon 1999).
Pharyngeal teeth count:
0,4-4,0 or 1,4-4,1 (Page and Burr 1991), usually 0,4-4,0(Burr and Cashner 1983;
Miller and Robison 2004).
Counts: 49-57 lateral
line scales; scales around the body 39-46; 8 dorsal fin soft rays; 7
anal fin soft rays; 8 pelvic fin soft rays (Miller and Robison 2004).
Body shape: Terete
and stout.
Mouth position:
Subterminal.
Morphology:
Lower jaw with cartilaginous ridge (Hubbs et al. 1991). Mature males have
large, slightly hooked whitish tubercles on top of head between nape and
nostrils, grading into smaller tubercles on the entire dorsum (tubercles
lost shortly after spawning; Miller 1962). Intestine very long,
spirally-wound completely
around air bladder (Hubbs et al. 1991;
Goldstein and Simon 1999).
Distribution (Native and Introduced)
U.S. distribution:
Widespread throughout the eastern United States (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Isolated populations in Rio San Juan, Mexico, and smaller tributaries of
Thames River, ON (Burr 1980).
Texas distribution:
Found primarily in streams of the Edwards Plateau and occurs as far west as
the Devils River and Sycamore Creek (Hubbs et al. 1991; Edwards 1997).
Warren et al. (2000) listed the following drainage units for distribution of
this species in the state: Red River (from the mouth upstream
to and including the Kiamichi River), Galveston Bay (including minor coastal
drainages west to mouth of Brazos River), Brazos River, Colorado River, San
Antonio Bay (including minor coastal drainages west of mouth of Colorado
River to mouth of Nueces River), Nueces River. Hubbs (1957) reported that
the species has been taken in the Red River Drainage of eastern Texas but
not from the Sabine; is common in limestone waters to the west; further,
this species inhabits the entire Balconian Biotic Province and parts of the
Rio Grande system.
[Additional literature
noting collection of this species from Texas locations includes, but is not
limited to the following: Hubbs (1954); Hubbs and Hettler (1958);
Lundberg (1967); Whiteside and McNatt (1972); Edwards (1978); Rose and
Echelle (1981); Gold (1984); Linam and Kleinsasser (1987).]
Abundance/Conservation status (Federal, State, Non-government
organizations):
Currently secure in the
southern Unites States (Warren 2000).
Habitat Associations
Macrohabitat: Small to
medium sized streams (Burr 1980).
Mesohabitat:
Associated with gravel substrate in clear to turbid riffles and pools in
higher-gradient streams (Burr 1980). In Texas, and elsewhere, generally
found in small, clear streams with gravel, rubble, or exposed bedrock
(Edwards 1997); often the most abundant species in small streams and schools
may contain several hundred individuals (Miller 1962; Becker 1983; Matthews et al.
1987; Edwards 1997). Species collected exclusively in the tailwaters of
Possum Kingdom Reservoir, Texas (Anderson et al. 1983). Riggs and Bonn
(1959) reported the species as common in Buncombe and Briar creeks and other
rocky, sandy tributaries on the Oklahoma side of Lake Texoma. Commonly found
in tailwater tributaries of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma, and in smaller
less permanent streams; typically occurring in gravelly or rocky riffles
(Echelle and Schnell 1976). Mundahl and Ingersoll (1989) collected specimens
from pools and riffles in a small Ohio stream. Commonly found in smaller
creeks maintaining at least some current throughout the majority of the
year, especially during spring spawning season (Edwards 1997). Newly hatched
central stonerollers school and feed near vegetated stream margins and in quiet warm
backwaters in the late spring and early summer; juveniles frequently inhabit
swifter waters around vegetated riffles during the summer and fall, and are
commonly found in midstream habitats in pools having algal mats and
moderately flowing currents (Theodorakis 1987; Leonard and Orth 1988;
Mundahl and Ingersoll 1989; Edwards 1997). Central stonerollers display some intolerance
to heavy siltation or pollutants which may affect quantity of available
algae in pool and riffle habitats (Edwards 1997).
Biology
Spawning season: In
Texas, nest building from early February through early July, spawning from
mid-February through mid-July (Edwards 1997).
Spawning location:
Pools adjacent to riffles (Burr 1980). In smaller creeks, sites located at
the upstream portions of pools in slow-moving areas, frequently in
association with significant quantities of sand, gravel, and abundant algal
mats (Edwards 1997). In Great Smokey Mountain National Park, central
stonerollers
constructed nests in gravel in the tailwater of pools and at the heads of
riffles in the main stream as well as small tributaries (Lennon
and Parker 1960).
Reproductive strategy:
Nonguarders; brood hiders; lithophils – rock and gravel spawners that do not
guard their eggs (Reed 1958; Miller 1962; Simon 1999). Males build pits in
gravel riffles by “rolling” larger stones away; eggs adhesive and attached
to stones in nest; males defend nests (Miller 1962). This species will spawn
over the nests of Semotilus atromaculatus (creek chub), but may also
be displaced from the nest by this larger species of cyprinid. Central
stoneroller nests may also be used by other cyprinid fishes (Miller
1962; Miller 1964).
Fecundity: Estimated
200 – 4800 eggs per female, with females ranging in size from 65-130 mm
(2.56-5.11 in) SL
(Schmulbach 1957). Mature egg measures 2.0 mm (0.08 in)diameter, and measures 2.4 mm
(0.09 in) diameter when placed in water (at which time chorion is released
from yolk and slowly fills with water); unfertilized eggs are sphere-shaped
and dull gray in appearance; fertilized eggs bright yellow and adhesive
(Reed 1958); hatching occurs in approximately 69-72 hours (Reed 1958; Hiltibran 1967).
Age at maturation:
Likely by age 1. Hubbs and Cooper (1936) estimated that maturity is
reaches during the 2nd or 3rd summer. In Wisconsin,
breeding fish are age 2 or 3 (Becker 1983). In Great Smokey Mountain
National Park, majority of fish reached maturity in their 3rd or
4th year of life (Lennon and Parker 1960).
Migration: Smith
(1935) observed this species in streams forming part of the Susquehanna
drainage, principally in Catatonk, Jackson, and Newtown Creeks, New York,
reporting that it is essentially a migratory fish, ascending smaller streams
to spawn in early spring; relatively few fish remain in small streams all
year.
Longevity:
3 to 4 years (Edwards 1997). Lennon and Parker (1960) reported
collection of specimens up to 6 years old, in Great Smokey Mountains
National Park.
Food habits: Primarily
herbivorous, using its cartilaginous lower jaw to feed on filamentous algae,
diatoms, aquatic insects (Fowler and Tabor 1985, McNeely 1987). Young fish
feed on rotifers, filamentous algae, and microcrustacea (Edwards 1997).
Matthews et al. (1986) observed schools of fish grazing over rocks or on
limestone ledges, and reported that distinctive grazing scars were left on
areas as a result of feeding on algae. Goldstein and Simon (1999) listed
first and second level trophic classifications for this species as herbivore
and particulate feeder, respectively; trophic mode: grazer; feeding
behavior: grazing minnow.
Growth: Up to
65 mm (2.56 in) SL by age 1 and 110 mm (4.33 in) SL by age 2 (Edwards 1997).
In Big Creek, Great Smokey Mountains National Park, the length range of age
groups were recorded as: 0 – 56mm (2.20 in), I – 79-104 mm
(3.11-4.09 in), II – 117-132
mm (4.60-5.20 in), III – 127-206 mm (5.00-8.11 in), IV – 165-239 mm
(6.50-9.41 in), and V – 173-226 mm (6.81-8.90 in) (Lennon and Parker 1960;
Becker 1983).
Phylogeny and morphologically similar fishes:
Campostoma form a
monophyletic group with Dionda and Hybognathus (Coburn and
Cavender 1992). In Texas, C. anomalum closet extant relative is
C. ornatum (Mexican stoneroller). Campostoma anomalum has larger
scales than C. ornatum (Hubbs et al. 1991) with the gas bladder
completely enclosed by the spirally-wound intestine; Campostoma ornatum
has a gas bladder only partially enclosed by the spirally-wound intestine.
C. anomalum and C. ornatum differ further in that C.
anomalum has 49-57 lateral line scales (Miller and Robison 2004), and
36-46 scales around body at dorsal fin origin, while C. ornatum has
58-77 lateral scales, and has 47-60 scales around body at dorsal fin origin
(Page and Burr 1991).
Host Records:
Monogenetic
trematodes: Dactylogyrus acus, D. georgiensis, D.
katherineae, D. semotilus (Mizelle and McDougal 1970).
Commercial or Environmental
Importance
According to Lennon and
Parker (1960), in Great Smokey Mountains National Park, central
stonerollers destroy redds of Salmo gairdneri (rainbow trout),
consequently limiting trout reproduction.
References
Anderson, K.A., T.L. Beitinger, and E.G. Zimmerman. 1983. Forage fish
assemblages in the Brazos River upstream and downstream from Possum Kingdom
Reservoir, Texas. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 2(1):81-88.
Becker, G.C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press,
Madison. 1052 pp.
Burr, B.M. 1980. Campostoma anomalum (Rafinesque), Stoneroller.
pp.143 in D. S. Lee, et al. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes. N.
C. State Mus. Nat. Hist., Raleigh. i-r+854 pp.
Burr, B.M., and R.C. Cashner. Campostoma pauciradii, a new cyprinid
fish from southeastern United States, with a review of related forms. Copeia
1983(1):101-116.
Cook. F.A. 1959. Freshwater fishes in Mississippi. Mississippi Fame and Fish
Commission, Jackson. 239 pp.
Echelle, A.A., and G.D. Schnell. 1976. Factor analysis of species
associations among fishes of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma. Trans. Amer.
Fish. Soc. 105(1):17-31.
Edwards, R.J. 1997. Ecological Profiles for Selected Stream-Dwelling Texas
Freshwater Fishes. Texas Water Development Board, Report. 89 pp.
Edwards, R.J. 1978. The effect of hypolimnion reservoir releases on fish
distribution and species diversity. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 107(1):71-77.
Fowler, J.F. and C.A Taber. 1985. Food habits and feeding periodicity in
two sympatric stonerollers (Cyprinidae). American Midland Naturalist,
113(2):217-224.
Gold, J.R. 1984. Silver-staining and heteromorphism of chromosomal nucleolus
organizer regions in North American cyprinid fishes. Copeia 1984(1):133-139.
Goldstein, R.M., and T.P. Simon. 1999. Toward a united definition of guild
structure for feeding ecology of North American freshwater fishes. pp.
123-202 in T.P. Simon, editor. Assessing the sustainability and
biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, Florida. 671 pp.
Hiltibran, R.C. 1967. Effects of some herbicides on fertilized fish eggs and
fry. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 96(4):414-416.
Hubbs, C. 1954. Corrected distributional records for Texas freshwater
fishes. Texas Journal of Science 1954(3):277-291.
Hubbs, C., and W.F. Hettler. 1958. Fluctuations of some central Texas fish
populations. The Southwestern Naturalist 1(1/4):13-16.
Hubbs, C. 1957. Distributional patterns of Texas fresh-water fishes. The
Southwestern Naturalist 2(2/3):89-104.
Hubbs, C., R. J. Edwards, and G. P. Garrett. 1991. An annotated checklist
of the freshwater fishes of Texas, with keys to identification of species.
The Texas Journal of Science, Supplement 43(4):1-56.
Hubbs, C.L., and G.P. Cooper. 1936. Minnows of Michigan. Cranbrook Inst. of
Sci., Bull. 8. 84 pp.
Lennon, R.E. and P.S. Parker. 1960. The stoneroller minnow, Campostoma
anomalum (Rafinesque), in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Trans.
Amer. Fish. Soc. 89:263-270.
Leonard, P.M., and D.J. Orth. 1988. Use of habitat guilds of fishes to
determine instream flow requirements. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manage.
8(4):399-409.
Linam, G.W., and L.J. Kleinsasser. 1987. Fisheries use attainability study
for the Bosque River. River Studies Report No. 4. Resource Protection
Division, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin. 24 pp.
Lundberg, J.G. 1967. Pleistocene fishes of the Good Creek Formation, Texas.
Copeia 1967(2):453-455.
Matthews, W.J., M.E. Power, and A.J. Stewart. 1986. Depth distribution of
Campostoma grazing scars in an Ozark stream. Environmental Biology of
Fishes 17(4):291-297.
Matthews, W.J., A.J. Stewart, and M.E. Power. 1987. Grazing fishes as
components of North American stream ecosystems: effects of Campostoma
anomalum, pp. 128-135. In: Community and Evolutionary Ecology of
North American Stream Fishes. W.J. Matthews, and D.C. Heins, eds. University
Oklahoma Press, Norman.
McNeely, D.L. 1987. Niche relations within an Ozark stream cyprinid
assemblage. Environmental Biol. Fish. 18:195-208.
Miller, R.J. 1962. Reproductive behavior of the stoneroller minnow,
Campostoma anomalum pullum. Copeia 1962(2):407-417.
Miller, R.J. 1964. Behavior and ecology of some North American cyprinid
fishes. American Midland Naturalist 72(2):313-357.
Miller, R.J., and H.W. Robison. 2004. Fishes of Oklahoma. University of
Oklahoma Press, Norman. 450 pp.
Mizelle, J.D., and H.D. McDougal. 1970. Studies on monogenetic trematodes.
XLV. The genus Dactylogyrus in North America. Key to species,
host-parasite and parasite-host lists, localities, emendations, and
description of D. kritskyi sp. n. American Midland Naturalist
84(2):444-462.
Mundahl, N.D., and C.G. Ingersoll. 1989. Home range, movements, and density
of the central stoneroller, Campostoma anomalum, in a small Ohio
stream. Environmental Biology of Fishes 24(4):307-311.
Page, L.M., and B.M. Burr. 1991. A Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North
America, north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 432 pp.
Rafinesque, C.S. 1820. Ichthyologia Ohiensis, or natural history of the
fishes inhabiting the River Ohio and its tributary streams, preceded by a
physical description of the Ohio and its branches. W. G. Hunt, Lexington,
Ky.
Reed, R.J. 1958. The early life history of two cyprinids, Notropis
rubellus and Campostoma anomalum pullum. Copeia 1958(4):325-327.
Riggs, C.D., and E.W. Bonn. 1959. An annotated list of the fishes of Lake
Texoma, Oklahoma and Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist 4(4):157-168.
Rose, D.R., and A.A. Echelle. 1981. Factor analysis of fishes in Little
River, central Texas, with an interdrainage comparison. American Midland
Naturalist 106(2):379-391.
Ross, S. T.
2001. The Inland Fishes of Mississippi. University Press of Mississippi,
Jackson. 624 pp.
Schmulbach, J.C. 1957. The life history of the central stoneroller,
Campostoma anomalum pullum Agassiz. Unpubl. M. A. Thesis,
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. 59 pp.
Simon, T.P. 1999. Assessment of Balon’s reproductive guilds with application
to Midwestern North American Freshwater Fishes, pp. 97-121. In:
Simon, T.L. (ed.). Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of
water resources using fish communities. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida. 671
pp.
Smith, O.R. 1935. The breeding habits of the stone roller minnow (Campostoma
anomalum Rafinesque). Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 65(1):148-151.
Theodorakis, C.W. 1987. Size segregation in minnow schools. Bull. Ecol. Soc.
Amer. 68(3):428.
Warren, M.L., Jr., B.M. Burr, S.J. Walsh, H.L. Bart, Jr., R.C. Cashner, D.A.
Etnier, B.J. Freeman, B.R. Kuhajda, R.L. Mayden, H.W. Robison, S.T. Ross,
and W.C. Starnes. 2000. Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation status of
the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries,
Conservation. 25(10):7-29.
Whiteside, B.G., and R.M. McNatt. 1972. Fish species diversity in relation
to stream order and physiochemical conditions in the Plum Creek Drainage
basin. American Midland Naturalist 88(1):90-101.
|